ethical scenarios
ethical scenarios代写 1. Introduction ： This report will analyze the case study which involves following characters Kelvin, Vanessa, James, and Toby.
Table of Contents
1.Introduction
2. Analysis
2.1. Personal Factors
2.2. Professional Factors
2.3. Legal Factors
2.4. Prioritization
2.5. Decision
3.Discussion
4.Conclusion
5.References
1. Introduction
This report will analyze the case study which involves following characters Kelvin, Vanessa, James, and Toby. The decision making of the following characters has been reviewed using Ethical Decision Making Model (EDM). The behavior of these characters in the case study is shaped by their own personal interests. In this case, we will analyze the factors that affect individual’s actions. EDM posited by David Tuffley has been used to analyze the ethical behaviors of the preceding characters.
In ethical scenario of Kevin, we see Kevin a recent IT graduate has incorporated some exaggerated skills in order to get a job.
Kevin then discovered some dark secrets about the business he is working for. Kevin entered the partitioned system despite prohibition and learned some illegal thing about the firm. He also learned that the company has not declared the income to avoid tax. Likewise, Vanessa, a credible, well-reputed database security specialist was involved in a design process by a company who later on decided for a less secure system rather than high security as they found it costly. However, Vanessa comprehends the requirement of a system and data to be stored is highly sensitive. Thus, she tried to persuade the company to go for high security system rather than weak security system. But the CEO is not ready to agree and formed an opinion that Vanessa is doing this for her own profitability.
James; the HCI consultant has started working for Company A in designing contract. James, while setting a new design realized that the software he is going to use actually has a Graphic User Interface which is owned by Company B for which James used to work previously. James is not prohibited by Company A to discuss any information about the company A outside the company. Now James has to make decision whether he should inform Company B about their copied GUI or he should inform Company A of the patent infringement.
译文：
1.简介 ethical scenarios代写
本报告将分析案例研究，涉及以下角色 Kelvin、Vanessa、James 和 Toby。以下字符的决策已使用道德决策模型（EDM）进行了审查。案例研究中这些角色的行为是由他们自己的个人兴趣决定的。在这种情况下，我们将分析影响个人行为的因素。 David Tuffley 提出的 EDM 已被用于分析前面角色的道德行为。
在 KEVIN 的道德情景中，我们看到 KEVIN 一位最近的 IT 毕业生为了得到一份工作而融入了一些夸张的技能。
凯文随后发现了一些关于他所工作的企业的黑暗秘密。凯文不顾禁令进入了分区系统，并了解到了一些关于公司的非法事情。他还了解到，该公司未申报收入避税。同样，Vanessa，一位可信的、享有盛誉的数据库安全专家参与了一家公司的设计过程，该公司后来决定采用安全性较低的系统，而不是高安全性的系统，因为他们发现这样做成本很高。但是，Vanessa 理解系统的要求，并且要存储的数据是高度敏感的。因此，她试图说服公司采用高安全系统而不是弱安全系统。但 CEO 还没有准备好同意并形成了一种意见，即 Vanessa 这样做是为了她自己的盈利能力。
詹姆士; HCI 顾问已开始为 A 公司设计合同。 James 在设置新设计时意识到他将要使用的软件实际上有一个图形用户界面，该界面归 James 以前工作过的 B 公司所有。 A 公司不禁止 James 在公司外讨论有关 A 公司的任何信息。现在，James 必须决定是应将其复制的 GUI 告知公司 B 还是应将专利侵权告知公司 A。
In part 2 we have Toby’s case.
Toby is a full stack developer working for an IT industry in Brisbane. Toby has assigned with a task to upgrade the web-based order entry. Meanwhile, Alec Smith suddenly leaves the company who is Toby’s boss. Toby worked hard for Alec’s position and confirmed himself for management position. Meanwhile, he learned that the two highly paid contractors Dev A and Dev B have been hired by Alec are incompetent.
Alec favored them both because they were his buddies. Dev A did not get his contract renewed and Toby replaced his position someone better. Now Alec called Toby and pressurize him to cancel the performance review for Dev A sending a memo to senior management stating that there is no problem with his performance. Toby refused his requests and the project was placed on hold and cancelled eventually. Afterwards Toby was approached by another senior manager of another company who offered him to work for him. He cancelled Toby’s interview stating that his previous report was bad which Toby found later on that the process was influenced by Alec.
Now Toby at another ecommerce company has been invited by CEO, who asked him about Alec Smith as was thinking to hire him. Now Toby can either take his revenge or give a true unbiased suggestion about Alec Smith to his boss.
译文：
在第 2 部分中，我们有托比的案例。 ethical scenarios代写
Toby 是一名全栈开发人员，在布里斯班的一个 IT 行业工作。 Toby 已分配任务来升级基于 Web 的订单条目。与此同时，亚历克·史密斯突然离开了托比老板的公司。托比为亚历克的职位努力工作，并确认了自己的管理职位。同时，他得知亚历克聘请的两名高薪承包商Dev A和Dev B不称职。
亚历克偏爱他们两个，因为他们是他的朋友。 Dev A 没有得到续约，Toby 用更好的人代替了他的职位。现在亚力克打电话给托比，迫使他取消对开发人员 A 的绩效评估，向高级管理层发送了一份备忘录，说明他的表现没有问题。托比拒绝了他的请求，该项目最终被搁置并取消。之后，另一家公司的另一位高级经理找到了托比，让他为他工作。他取消了托比的采访，说他之前的报告很糟糕，托比后来发现这个过程受到了亚历克的影响。
现在，另一家电子商务公司的 Toby 受到 CEO 的邀请，CEO 向他询问了 Alec Smith 的情况，因为他正在考虑雇用他。现在，托比既可以报仇雪恨，也可以向他的老板提出关于亚历克·史密斯的真实、公正的建议。
2. Analysis
2.1. Personal Factors
Factor 1 – Taking Personal Revenge
Toby was misled by Alec when he was about to join Ben’s company after an interview which got cancelled as Alec intervened and influenced the hiring process. Here, Alec took a personal revenge from Toby because he did not concede his proposal regarding the cancelation of performance review of Dev A. This is the violation of the primacy of the public interest by Alec.
Factor 2 – Lying on your resume
Kevin has recently graduated and requires a job right away. Though he believes in himself that he is going to learn the skills needed for this job he exaggerated his skillset in this CV to get a job which was unethical. Kevin was unable to do his job properly later on. He did not quit the job even after he has been pointed by his boss at several occasions that he is not doing a particular task properly (Australian Computer Society , 2014).
译文：
2. 分析 ethical scenarios代写
2.1. 个人因素
因素 1 – 进行个人报复
托比在一次面试后准备加入本的公司时被亚历克误导，但由于亚历克干预并影响了招聘流程而被取消。 在这里，Alec 向 Toby 进行了个人报复，因为他没有承认他关于取消 Dev A 绩效审查的提议。 这是 Alec 违反公共利益至上的行为。
因素 2 – 在简历上撒谎
凯文最近刚毕业，需要马上工作。 尽管他相信自己将学习这份工作所需的技能，但他在这份简历中夸大了自己的技能，以得到一份不道德的工作。 凯文后来无法正常工作。 即使他的老板多次指出他没有正确完成特定任务，他也没有辞去工作（澳大利亚计算机协会，2014 年）。
2.2. Professional Factors
Factor 3 – Data Security
Kevin was forbidden to intervene in highly secured partitioned system but he got the passwords list and choose to enter the system. After entering the system Kevin knows too much about the company including the illegal activities it is involved in. Kevin chose to intervene the privacy now he is endeavored to preserve the privacy and confidentiality of the company’s information.
Factor 4 – Professional guidance
Vanessa told the large organization she is working for to go for highly secured system rather than low security system keeping in view the sensitivity of the data including the medical records of insurance claims, salaries and performance evaluation. Vanessa has acted with honesty, professionalism and integrity. She did not misled the client knowingly though they thing Vanessa is suggesting high security system to earn more profit. Her professional opinions were highly based on her own experience. She has distinguished between her professional and personal advice.
Factor 5 – Services matching financial needs of the stakeholder
Vanessa was endeavored to provide products and services that match the financial needs of the stakeholders as well as their operational needs. The operational needs are fulfilled but Vanessa did not fulfil the financial needs yet. On the other hand, Vanessa has advised their stakeholder that the low security system is not in their best interest.
译文：
2.2.专业因素 ethical scenarios代写
因素 3 – 数据安全
凯文被禁止干预高度安全的分区系统，但他得到了密码列表并选择进入系统。进入系统后，Kevin 对公司包括其所涉及的非法活动了解得太多。Kevin 现在选择介入隐私，是为了保护公司信息的隐私和机密性。
因素 4 – 专业指导
Vanessa 告诉她正在工作的大型组织，考虑到包括保险索赔的医疗记录、工资和绩效评估在内的数据的敏感性，她正在寻求高度安全的系统而不是低安全系统。 Vanessa 以诚实、专业和正直的态度行事。她并没有故意误导客户，尽管他们认为 Vanessa 建议使用高安全性系统来赚取更多利润。她的专业意见高度基于她自己的经验。她区分了她的专业建议和个人建议。
因素 5 – 符合利益相关者财务需求的服务
Vanessa 致力于提供符合利益相关者的财务需求及其运营需求的产品和服务。运营需求已满足，但 Vanessa 尚未满足财务需求。另一方面，Vanessa 已告知他们的利益相关者，低安全性系统不符合他们的最佳利益。
Factor 6 – Patent Infringement
James an HCI consultant has learned that Company A has copied the GUI of Company B for which James used to work before. James is not allowed by the company to discuss the matter with anyone outside the contract. It is clear that Company A has copied the GUI of Company B which is violation of honesty and integrity of ACS Code of Professional Conduct. This is copyright infringement.
Factor 7 – Merit based decisions
Toby replaced Dev A with a better performer as Dev A’s performance was not up to mark. Despite being pressurized by Alec Toby did not changed the performance review for Dev A. Toby act with honesty and made transparent decisions based on merit.
Factor 8 – Personal favor & biased decisions
Alec hired Dev A and Dev B as they were his friends. Thereby, he gave them personal favor and violated the act of honesty in ACS Professional Code of Conduct. He has also violated the act of professionalism stating the confrontation of limiting the diversity in the workplace and ensuring that opportunities for employment and working conditions are based on the actual performance of the employees and the skill set they possess free of prejudices and stereotypes. Alec has profoundly violated this act of professionalism.
译文：
因素 6 – 专利侵权 ethical scenarios代写
HCI 顾问 James 了解到，A 公司复制了 James 以前工作过的 B 公司的 GUI。公司不允许詹姆斯在合同之外与任何人讨论此事。很明显，A 公司复制了 B 公司的 GUI，这违反了 ACS 职业行为准则的诚实和正直。这是侵犯版权。
因素 7 – 基于绩效的决策
托比用表现更好的人代替了开发者 A，因为开发者 A 的表现不合格。尽管受到 Alec Toby 的压力，他并没有改变 Dev A 的绩效评估。 Toby 诚实行事，并根据绩效做出了透明的决定。
因素 8 – 个人喜好和有偏见的决定
Alec 聘请了 Dev A 和 Dev B，因为他们是他的朋友。因此，他给了他们个人恩惠，并违反了 ACS 职业行为准则中的诚实行为。他还违反了专业行为，指出限制工作场所的多样性和确保就业机会和工作条件基于员工的实际表现和他们拥有的技能组合，没有偏见和成见是对立的。亚历克严重违反了这种专业行为。
Factor 9 – Intervening in performance review
Alec further violate professionalism by pressurizing Toby in a closed meeting to retract his proposed performance review and send a memo to senior management that he has no issues with Dev A performance. Here Alec is pressurizing Toby to act in dishonest way. He also breached professionalism by attempting to influence the Toby and force him to take action breaching this code.
Factor 10 – Taking Revenge
Alec further act unprofessionally by taking personal revenge from Toby. He intervened in the hiring process of Toby and presented a false report about Toby to Ben who later on cancelled Toby’s interview considering his bad report. Here Alec again violated professionalism he influenced Ben to take action in his interest breaching the code of professionalism. He also violated the code of honesty by positing false report on Toby to Ben to influence his hiring process. Alec has repeatedly engage in unethical behavior. He also violated the code of professional development degrading Toby to continue his professional development by positing his false performance report (Australian Computer Society , 2014).
译文：
因素 9 – 干预绩效评估
亚历克在一次非公开会议上向托比施压，要求他撤回他提议的绩效评估，并向高级管理层发送一份备忘录，表明他对开发 A 的绩效没有问题，这进一步违反了专业精神。在这里，亚力克向托比施压，让他以不诚实的方式行事。他还试图影响托比并迫使他采取违反此守则的行动，从而违反了专业精神。
因素 10 – 报复
亚历克进一步采取不专业的行为，向托比进行个人报复。他干预了托比的招聘过程，并向本提交了一份关于托比的虚假报告，本后来考虑到托比的糟糕报告取消了对托比的采访。在这里，亚历克再次违反了专业精神，他影响了本，为了他的利益采取了违反专业准则的行动。他还违反了诚实守则，向 Ben 提交了关于 Toby 的虚假报告，以影响他的招聘流程。亚历克一再从事不道德的行为。他还违反了职业发展准则，通过提供虚假的绩效报告来贬低托比继续他的职业发展（澳大利亚计算机协会，2014 年）。
2.3. Legal Factors
Factor 11 – Getting into Privacy
Kevin was prohibited to enter the highly secured system. However, Kevin took the passwords out of his drawer and entered the highly confidential information breaching the confidentiality. He breached the code of preserving the confidentiality and privacy of others.
Factor 12 – Illegal Activities
Kevin works for Ajax a legitimate trucking business. Kevin learned that the business is engaged in the transport of black market goods at a large scale. These goods can be tobacco, firearms, or drugs. Whatever the goods may be they are illegal.
Factor 13 – Hidden Income to avoid Tax
Another thing Kevin learned about Ajax truck business is that they have not declared their income. The income they generate is not routed in the main accounts of the company to avoid tax. The income is not declared to Australian Tax Office (ATO) which is another illegal act.
Factors 14 – Intellectual Property
James learned that Company A has copied the Graphical User Interface of Company B. Thus, Company A has breached the code of respecting intellectual property of others (Australian Computer Society , 2014).
译文：
2.3.法律因素 ethical scenarios代写
因素 11 – 进入隐私
凯文被禁止进入高度安全的系统。然而，凯文从抽屉里拿出密码，输入了泄露机密的高度机密信息。他违反了保护他人机密和隐私的准则。
因素 12 – 非法活动
凯文为 Ajax 一家合法的货运公司工作。凯文了解到，该企业从事大规模的黑市货物运输。这些商品可以是烟草、枪支或毒品。无论货物是什么，它们都是非法的。
因素 13 – 为避税而隐藏的收入
凯文从阿贾克斯卡车业务中了解到的另一件事是，他们没有申报收入。他们产生的收入不会进入公司的主要账户以避免税收。未向澳大利亚税务局 (ATO) 申报收入，这是另一项非法行为。
因素 14 – 知识产权
James 了解到 A 公司复制了 B 公司的图形用户界面。因此，A 公司违反了尊重他人知识产权的准则（澳大利亚计算机协会，2014 年）。
2.4. Prioritization
| Factor | Related Issue | |
| 1. | Taking Personal Revenge | Alec influenced Toby’s hiring procedure. |
| 2. | Lying on resume | Kevin lied on his resume. |
| 3. | Data Security | Kevin got into highly secured system. |
| 4. | Professional guidance | Vanessa provided professional guidance to her clients. |
| 5. | Services matching financial needs of the stakeholder | Vanessa could not understood the financial need of the stakeholders |
| 6. | Patent Infringement | James learned about patent infringement by Company A. |
| 7. | Merit based decisions | Toby terminated Dev A for poor performance |
| 8. | Personal favor & biased decisions | Dev A and Dev B were favored by Alec because they were his friend |
| 9. | Taking Revenge | Alec provided false report to Ben about Toby taking his revenge |
| 10. | Intervening in performance review | Alec pressurized Toby to Dev A’s performance review |
| 11. | Getting into Privacy | Kevin was proscribed to enter secured system which he breached anyway. |
| 12. | Illegal Activities | Ajax was involved in transporting the black market goods. |
| 13. | Hidden Income to avoid Tax | Ajax did not declare their income to Australian Tax office. |
| 14. | Intellectual Property | Company copied the GUI of Company B. |
2.5. Decision
Keeping in view the following ethical facets EDM can be used to see how the following actors should have acted in these situation. Kevin; one of the key characters decided to intervene in company’s privacy. Kevin learn about the illegal activities of the company. Knowing too much Kevin is now obliged to inform the authorities about these illegal activities.
Vanessa acted professionally and gave accurate advice to her clients but they wanted low cost solution. Here Vanessa should have tried to meet the financial needs of the client. Likewise, James knew about the patent infringement by company A. James should immediately inform the Company A about the infringement rather than informing Company B. He should inform company B if Company A does not act on his suggestion.
Toby should tell the truth about Alec to his new boss. He should not produce false report like Alec to take his personal revenge.
译文：
2.5. 决定 ethical scenarios代写
考虑到以下道德方面，EDM 可用于查看以下参与者在这些情况下应如何行事。 凯文; 关键人物之一决定干预公司的隐私。 凯文了解公司的非法活动。 知道太多的凯文现在不得不将这些非法活动告知当局。
Vanessa 行事专业，为她的客户提供准确的建议，但他们想要低成本的解决方案。 在这里，Vanessa 应该努力满足客户的财务需求。 同样，James 知道 A 公司的专利侵权。James 应立即通知 A 公司，而不是通知 B 公司。如果 A 公司不按照他的建议采取行动，他应该通知 B 公司。
托比应该把亚历克的真相告诉他的新老板。 他不应该像亚历克那样制作虚假报告来进行个人报复。
3. Discussion
The key factors that shape the overall actions of the preceding characters have been identified. The most important factor which has been highlighted are personal factors. As we see, character like Alec preferred to take personal revenge from Toby. Likewise, Kevin decided to intervene into security personally. The professional and legal issues are all related to the privacy of the data. The issue of privacy was highlighted in Kevin, and James case. Ethical issues are more prevalent in the corporate world than legal issues. Thus ethical issues have been prioritized in EDM (Professional Issues Assignment, 2018).
译文：
3. 讨论 ethical scenarios代写
已经确定了影响前面角色整体动作的关键因素。 被强调的最重要的因素是个人因素。 正如我们所看到的，像亚历克这样的角色更喜欢向托比报仇。 同样，凯文决定亲自干预安全。 专业和法律问题都与数据隐私有关。 在凯文和詹姆斯案中强调了隐私问题。 在企业界，道德问题比法律问题更为普遍。 因此，道德问题在 EDM 中被优先考虑（Professional Issues Assignment，2018 年）。
4. Conclusion
The characters acted differently each of these characters have their own moral ground on which they acted. Many decisions taken by the characters in the cases are unethical and questionable. Even if their intentions are good the unethical acts are profound. Character such as Alec, and Kevin, have shown amoral approach. Some of them condoned the ethical considerations unintentionally ( 3410ICT & 7101ICT Professional Issues in Computing , 2021).
译文：
4. 结论 ethical scenarios代写
角色的行为各不相同，每个角色都有自己的道德基础。 案件中的人物做出的许多决定都是不道德和值得怀疑的。 即使他们的意图是好的，不道德的行为也是深刻的。 像亚历克和凯文这样的角色，都表现出了不道德的做法。 他们中的一些人无意中容忍了道德方面的考虑（3410ICT 和 7101ICT 计算专业问题，2021 年）。
References
3410ICT & 7101ICT Professional Issues in Computing . (2021). Case Studies 2021.
Australian Computer Society . (2014, April). ACS Code of Professional Conduct Professional Standards Board Australian Computer Society. Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/Sadia/Downloads/ACS%20Code-of-Professional-Conduct_v2.1.pdf
Professional Issues Assignment. (2018).
其他代写：essay代写 homework代写 Exercise代写 加拿大代写 英国代写 作业代写 CS代写 Data Analysis代写 data代写 澳大利亚代写 app代写 algorithm代写 作业加急 北美代写 北美作业代写 assignment代写 analysis代写 code代写 assembly代写
合作平台：essay代写 论文代写 写手招聘 英国留学生代写
