Name
Instructor
Course
Date
Understanding Poverty in the United States: Surprising Facts About America’s Poor by Robert Rector
美国经济论文代写 Rector made observations that the Census Bureau’s reports about the annual poverty are deceiving about the real status of American poverty.
Summary
Rector made observations that the Census Bureau’s reports about the annual poverty are deceiving about the real status of American poverty. He defined poor as those Americans without nutritious food, lack adequate housing or clothing. However, this is not the case in real sense. A poor person in United States has a house with an air-conditioning and cable TV. The electronics and equipment were owned by the middle-class decade ago. Therefore, according to him, although few Americans are struggling with poverty, the actual data about poverty is not available since those are termed poor are can afford some luxuries.
The Census Bureau declared in 2011 that 46.2 million people were living in poverty. The number indicated an increase in poverty from the previous year. Rector questioned the validity of these findings in real terms stating that there was need to have background check behind these numbers to establish the actual situation of poverty in United States rather than wholly relying on numbers. Although the identified poor group struggle their scope and severity are limited.
译文：
概括 美国经济论文代写
校长指出，美国人口普查局关于年度贫困的报告正在欺骗美国贫困的真实状况。他将穷人定义为那些没有营养食品，缺乏足够住房或衣着的美国人。但是，实际情况并非如此。在美国，一个穷人有一所带空调和有线电视的房子。电子设备属于十年前的中产阶级。因此，根据他的说法，尽管很少有美国人为贫困而挣扎，但有关贫困的实际数据却无法获得，因为那些被称为贫困的人可以负担得起一些奢侈品。
人口普查局在2011年宣布，有4,620万人生活在贫困中。该数字表明贫困率比上年有所增加。校长对这些调查结果的真实性提出质疑，指出有必要对这些数字进行背景调查，以确定美国的实际贫困状况，而不是完全依靠数字。尽管已确定的贫困群体在努力，但其范围和严重性是有限的。
Concerning his claim, Rector gave a summary of those termed poor by the Census Bureau statistics.
He found that 80 percent of poor families have air conditioning, which was considered a luxury in 1970s. Nearly 93 percent owned a microwave. Almost a three-quarter of them had a car or track with quarter of them having more than one. Almost two-thirds of them had cable or satellite TV. Two-third had DVD players. Half of them had a personal computer, and in every seven there was one with more than one computer. These details and more gave an overview of the condition of the poor in United States according to the federal statistics.
Notably, Rector explains that some of the items owned by these “poor” families were luxuries to the middle-class in few decades ago. Such things as cable and satellite TV, microwaves, and air-conditioning are not for a struggling family. Thus, will not be accurate to say that a poor family suffers from deprivation of basic needs such as housing, whereas more than 90 percent can afford electronics and items which can only be termed luxury to a poor family.
译文：
关于他的索赔，董事对人口普查局的统计数据表明这些条件欠佳。 美国经济论文代写
他发现80％的贫困家庭都装有空调，这在1970年代被认为是一种奢侈。近93％的人拥有微波炉。其中将近四分之三的人有汽车或赛道，其中有四分之一的汽车或轨道。他们中几乎有三分之二拥有有线电视或卫星电视。三分之二拥有DVD播放器。他们中有一半拥有一台个人计算机，每七个人中有一台拥有一台以上的计算机。根据联邦统计，这些细节以及更多内容概述了美国穷人的状况。
Rector尤其指出，这些“贫穷”家庭拥有的一些物品在几十年前是中产阶级的奢侈品。有线电视和卫星电视，微波炉和空调等设备不适合陷入困境的家庭。因此，不能说一个贫困家庭遭受住房等基本需求的折磨是不准确的，而超过90％的家庭可以买得起只能被视为贫困家庭的奢侈品的电子产品和物品。
What can be Learned
The article is an eye-opener regarding the definition of poverty in the context of Americans. Though the conventional meaning is the lack of basic needs like food, housing, and clothing, the description might not be applicable in the context of defining who is poor in America. Also, the better life observed in those termed as poor is the indication of progressive society that has succeeded in reducing poverty to significant levels. Additionally, there is need to have revised metric for assessing poverty to fit the new social and economic classes in American society.
译文：
可以学到什么 美国经济论文代写
这篇文章使美国人大开眼界，对贫困的定义大开眼界。 尽管常规含义是缺少食物，住房和衣服等基本需求，但该描述可能不适用于定义美国的穷人。 同样，在那些被称为贫困者的国家中，生活的改善表明进步社会已经成功地将贫困减少到了相当大的水平。 此外，需要修订评估贫困的指标，以适应美国社会中新的社会和经济阶层。
How the Article is Applicable in Social Welfare Policy
The article is a call for changes in social welfare programs. The program should redefine who is eligible for services such as food stamps, Medicaid, supplementary security income among others. The move will reduce the government spending on some welfare programs and see increase in other deserving ones.
译文：
该条款如何适用于社会福利政策 美国经济论文代写
这篇文章呼吁改变社会福利计划。 该计划应重新定义谁有资格获得食品券，医疗补助，补充安全收入等服务。 此举将减少政府在某些福利计划上的支出，而在其他应得的福利计划上也会有所增加。
Work Cited 美国经济论文代写
Rector, Robert, and Rachel Sheffield. “Understanding poverty in the United States: Surprising facts about America’s poor.” The Heritage Foundation Leadership for America (2011).
其他代写：essay代写 C++代写 C/C++代写 code代写 course代写 CS代写 assignment代写 homework代写 Exercise代写 algorithm代写 analysis代写 app代写 assembly代写 Data Analysis代写 data代写
