Risk Management
风险管理代写 The shooting was a harvest festival turned chaotic. It was October 1st, 2017 when a man unleashed a barrage of gunfire from Mandalay Bay hotel
Name
Institution
Risk Management
Las Vegas Shooting 风险管理代写
The shooting was a harvest festival turned chaotic. It was October 1st, 2017 when a man unleashed a barrage of gunfire from Mandalay Bay hotel (Ambellas, 2018). It is believed that the shooter sprayed bullets from the 32nd floor of the hotel which is about 400 yards from the scene. Few gunshots were heard first at around 10:00 pm before a fully automatic machine gun unleashed the bullets. People started running for their lives while jumping over fences to take cover. The shooting went on for like 10 minutes after which there were more than 50 gunfire casualties. Later, it was confirmed that 58 people died from gunshots and others were seriously injured.
Whether there was Negligence of Duty on the Part of Mandalay Bay Hotel
The questions that arose from the cases that were presented before the court were on negligence liability and their determination depends on whether the defendant owed the plaintiff a duty of reasonable care. The plaintiffs have to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the hotel had a duty of care and it was breached (Dorfman, 2016).风险管理代写
In the same case, whether Mandalay Bay had a duty to protect the people who attended the concert from the killer. In the same case, whether the hotel had a duty to protect it guests and any other person within the premises form any reasonable likely harm or danger. The contentious question was whether the same care it offered to its guests and anyone in the premises applies to the general and determination on whether the person carrying a weapon to his/her room and shooting to the public from the room was reasonable to foresee or not.风险管理代写
Further, in case the plaintiffs can establish that the hotel owed a duty of care to them,
another question will arise on whether the hotel breached that duty. It is believed that the shooter arrived into the hotel room three days before the shooting with 23 guns which included AR-15-style and AK-47-style rifles. The court needs to establish whether the hotel could have spotted the shooter and suspect him of any unusual behavior. The shooter had also installed a “Do Not Disturb” sign on the door to his room, hence the question is whether the hotel could have found it suspicious. Another question that arose is whether the hotel should have installed bulletproof window glasses and how was the response to the shooting.风险管理代写
At all accounts, the success of the suit solely depends on the plaintiffs being able to demonstrate that the hotel breached the duty and not intervening acts that caused casualties (Stein, 2017). In this case, the hotel was not negligent as it did not breach any duty it owes to the general public. Therefore, the course will likely find the shooter responsible for the shooting and mass killing.
Recommendation 风险管理代写
As the lawyer to the Mandalay Bay Hotel, I would recommend the installation of body scanners at the entrance of the hotel. The installation of these devices will control the type of tools allowed into the hotel premises. The devices could have detected the weapons used in the mass shooting. Another important thing is constant surveillance of the movement of people in the premises. A close look at the guests’ behaviors and movements would have maybe pointed to the shooter and mark him for further investigations which could have established his intention hence control the massacre.
References 风险管理代写
Ambellas, S. (2018). Las Vegas shooting: An in-depth analysis. Retrieved from https://www.intellihub.com/las-vegas-shooting-an-in-depth-analysis/
Dorfman, A. (2016). Negligence and accommodation. Legal Theory, 22(2), 77-123. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1352325216000100
Stein, A. (2017). THE DOMAIN OF TORTS. Columbia Law Review, 117(3), 535-611. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1914454905?accountid=45049
风险管理
名称
机构
风险管理
拉斯维加斯射击
枪击事件使收成节日变得混乱。 2017年10月1日，一名男子从曼德勒海湾酒店释放了一连串枪声（Ambellas，2018年）。据信，射手从距离现场约400码的酒店32楼喷射了子弹。在全自动机枪释放子弹之前，几乎没有人在晚上10:00左右听到枪声。人们开始跑来跑去，同时跳过篱笆掩护。枪击事件持续了大约10分钟，之后有50多人丧生。后来证实，有58人死于枪击，其他人受了重伤。风险管理代写
曼德勒海湾酒店是否有过失责任
由法院提起的案件引起的问题是过失责任，其裁决取决于被告是否负有对原告的合理照顾义务。原告必须在无合理怀疑的情况下证明酒店有责任谨慎并被违反（Dorfman，2016年）。在同一案例中，曼德勒海湾是否有义务保护参加音乐会的人们免受杀手的侵害。在同一情况下，酒店是否有责任保护其客人和场所内的任何其他人，构成任何合理的可能的伤害或危险。有争议的问题是，它是否向客人和房内的任何人提供同样的照顾，是否适用于将军，以及确定携带武器到其房间并从房间向公众射击的人是否可以合理预见？ 。风险管理代写
此外，如果原告可以确定旅馆欠他们的照顾义务，那么旅馆是否会违反该义务将引起另一个问题。据信，射击者在射击前三天就带着23支枪（包括AR-15型和AK-47型步枪）进入了酒店房间。法院需要确定酒店是否可能发现射手，并怀疑他有任何异常行为。射手还在房间的门上安装了“请勿打扰”标志，因此问题是旅馆是否会发现它可疑。出现的另一个问题是，酒店是否应该安装防弹窗玻璃，对枪击事件的反应如何。
不管怎样，诉讼的成功完全取决于原告能否证明酒店违反了职责并且没有干预导致人员伤亡的行为（Stein，2017）。在这种情况下，酒店没有疏忽，因为它没有违反应负给公众的任何责任。因此，该课程很可能会找到负责射击和大规模杀伤的射手。风险管理代写
推荐
作为曼德勒海湾酒店的律师，我建议在酒店入口安装人体扫描仪。这些设备的安装将控制允许进入酒店场所的工具的类型。这些设备本可以检测到大规模射击中使用的武器。另一重要的事情是对场所中人员流动的持续监视。仔细观察客人的行为和动作，可能会指向射手并标记他作进一步调查，这可能确定了他的意图，从而控制了屠杀。
参考
Ambellas, S. (2018). Las Vegas shooting: An in-depth analysis. Retrieved from https://www.intellihub.com/las-vegas-shooting-an-in-depth-analysis/
Dorfman, A. (2016). Negligence and accommodation. Legal Theory, 22(2), 77-123. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1352325216000100 风险管理代写
Stein, A. (2017). THE DOMAIN OF TORTS. Columbia Law Review, 117(3), 535-611. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1914454905?accountid=45049
其他代写：algorithm代写 analysis代写 app代写 assembly代写 Haskell代写 homework代写 java代写 jupyter notebook代写 数学代写 考试助攻 web代写 program代写 cs作业代写 source code代写 finance代写 Data Analysis代写 Task代写
