[Name of the Writer]
[Name of Instructor]
[English]
[Date]
Abortion is not morally wrong
道德与法律论文代写 Today, the world is dealing with a number of critical ethical dilemmas and the issue of abortion is one of them.
Introduction
Today, the world is dealing with a number of critical ethical dilemmas and the issue of abortion is one of them. The debaters are divided into two sides when it comes to deciding whether abortion is an ethically correct decision or not. It is noteworthy to mention that this specific issue is associated with various aspects of consideration that require immediate attention. These domains are mainly characterized as legal and ethical positions of the dilemma of abortion. The practice of abortion is identified as the intentional termination of a pregnancy with the use of surgical or other medical services. Abortion turned as the major cause of the great segregation of two schools of thought (Norris et al.).
There are liberals who believe that abortion is a matter of human rights because it is women’s fundamental right to form decisions about themselves according to their health and circumstances. There is a well-known viewpoint that the death of an individual member of the household causes an effect on the family, and the same is true for the case of abortion (Norris et al.). The killing of an individual irreplaceable, real, and living child can have a bad impact on the relationship between the parents as well as the siblings. In case a woman aborts her child just to make sure the partner stays are eventually left alone after their abortions.
译文：
介绍 道德与法律论文代写
今天，世界正面临着许多严重的伦理困境，堕胎问题就是其中之一。在决定堕胎是否是道德上正确的决定时，辩论者分为两派。值得注意的是，这个具体问题与需要立即关注的各个方面有关。这些领域主要表征为堕胎困境的法律和伦理立场。堕胎的做法被确定为通过使用外科手术或其他医疗服务有意终止妊娠。堕胎变成了两种思想流派大分裂的主要原因（诺里斯等人）。
有些自由主义者认为堕胎是一个人权问题，因为根据自己的健康和情况对自己做出决定是女性的基本权利。有一个众所周知的观点，即家庭成员的死亡会对家庭产生影响，堕胎的情况也是如此（Norris et al.）。杀害一个不可替代的、真实的和活着的孩子会对父母和兄弟姐妹之间的关系产生不良影响。万一一个女人为了确保伴侣留下来而流产她的孩子，最终他们会在流产后独自一人。
It can be stated that the use of abortions can never guarantee a loving and successful relationship.
According to Norris et al., the after-effects of abortions are significant for both the mother and the father, and their relationship. The reason for abortion for Bodenner was to avoid the difficulty of the process of childbirth. She was a highly paid professional with good experience and was an independent woman. She found it difficult to proceed with the baby and decided to abort due to the difficulties in her professional as well as personal relationships. She is of the viewpoint that it was a very bad decision made by her as it resulted in destroying everything from her health to her profession and relationships.道德与法律论文代写
The author also shares her experience that if she was known to what she is known now at that time she would have better handled the situation and also would not have inclined toward abortion (Bodenner). This paper focuses to critically analyze different evidence to develop this argument that abortion is a phenomenon of human rights because it is women’s legitimate right to decide about their bodies concerning their health and overall circumstances. The study is carried out to determine the ethical reasons why abortion should be illegal. The prime discussions include the harm of abortion to women; the process punishes innocent lives, and finally, the impact of abortion on relationships and families.
译文：
可以说，使用堕胎永远不能保证爱情和成功的关系。 道德与法律论文代写
根据诺里斯等人的说法，堕胎的后遗症对母亲和父亲以及他们的关系都很重要。博登纳堕胎的原因是避免分娩过程的困难。她是一位经验丰富的高薪专业人士，并且是一位独立的女性。由于她的职业和个人关系的困难，她发现很难继续怀上婴儿并决定流产。她认为这是她做出的一个非常糟糕的决定，因为它破坏了从她的健康到她的职业和人际关系的一切。
作者还分享了她的经验，如果她当时知道她现在所知道的事情，她会更好地处理这种情况，也不会倾向于堕胎（博登纳）。本文着重于批判性地分析不同的证据来发展这一论点，即堕胎是一种人权现象，因为妇女有权根据自己的健康和整体情况来决定自己的身体。进行这项研究是为了确定堕胎应该是非法的道德原因。主要讨论包括堕胎对妇女的危害；这个过程惩罚无辜的生命，最后惩罚堕胎对人际关系和家庭的影响。
My Views
It is vital to figure out how the practice of abortion is a concern of the fundamental form of human rights. The implication of the approach of human rights in the case of abortion can witness in many different forms such as it is related to the matter of gender equality. It is argued that the practical form of equality makes it essential to give necessary authority to women when it comes to making a decision regarding their pregnancy. The proponents of the practice of abortion argue that it is important to consider woman as a person who has some basic human rights. It is the fundamental right of every human being to decide according to the feasibility of their life (Norris et al.). The basic rights and needs of women should consider when it comes to making a choice between abortions and carrying babies.道德与法律论文代写
Another strong argument in favor of abortion as a basic human right of women is the influence gender of women disproportionately. It is a massive fact that the aspects of pregnancy and abortion greatly linked with the scenario of women’s rights because they are more influence by abortion as compare to men (Norris et al.). The perspective of pregnancy enormously impacts women in different forms that need to consider when it comes to formulating the decision of abortion.
译文：
我的观点
弄清楚堕胎的做法如何成为基本人权形式的关注点至关重要。在堕胎案件中人权方法的含义可以以许多不同的形式见证，例如它与性别平等问题有关。有人认为，平等的实际形式使得在决定怀孕时给予妇女必要的权力是必不可少的。堕胎实践的支持者认为，重要的是将女性视为拥有一些基本人权的人。根据生活的可行性做出决定是每个人的基本权利（诺里斯等人）。在堕胎和生育之间做出选择时，应考虑妇女的基本权利和需求。
支持堕胎作为女性基本人权的另一个有力论据是女性的性别影响不成比例。怀孕和堕胎的各个方面与妇女权利的情况密切相关，这是一个巨大的事实，因为与男性相比，堕胎对她们的影响更大（诺里斯等人）。怀孕的观点以不同的形式对妇女产生巨大影响，在制定堕胎决定时需要考虑这些问题。
The determinative domain of pregnancy on women can witness in the case of different spheres as it impacts their social prospect,
their education, employment, health, and overall well-being. Referring to all these aspects, if any woman never considers herself able to carry a baby then it is a moral obligation to give them a choice according to her circumstances (Norris et al.). The debate on abortion should analyze under the scenario of the basic human right of freedom to act. Forced pregnancy can characterize as a clear violation of the fundamental approach of freedom of action that eventually disturbs the facet of equality in society.道德与法律论文代写
Abortion activists share the view that abortion is not morally wrong due to various reasons. There are beliefs that without the practice of abortion, a woman may suffer from a negative or harmful impact on her physical as well as psychological wellbeing. Women may feel mental instability and even there are chances that women commit suicides. Along with that, there are abortion views shared and put forward by healthcare professionals that remain undeterred the main example is the “abortion traumatic stress syndrome”.
Researchers have identified that anxiety and other mental disorders have been found for women as the most common as well as adverse effects. The studies carried out have provided a viewpoint to build an association between abortions and trauma. It is important to understand the basis of humanity and therefore, abortion must be allowed to be legalized. People should need to consider the fact that the practice of abortion can significantly the wellbeing of a woman. Women should be allowed to continue with the abortion incases where it can cause severe medical complications for both the mother and the baby. Every human has the right to make his own decision. It is morally wrong to force a woman not to continue with the abortion.
译文：
怀孕对妇女的决定性领域可以在不同领域的情况下证明，因为它会影响她们的社会前景，
他们的教育、就业、健康和整体福祉。考虑到所有这些方面，如果任何女性从不认为自己能够生孩子，那么根据她的情况给她们选择是一种道德义务（Norris 等人）。关于堕胎的辩论应该在行动自由这一基本人权的情景下进行分析。强迫怀孕可以被定性为明显违反行动自由的基本方法，最终扰乱社会平等的方面。
堕胎活动人士认为，由于各种原因，堕胎在道德上并没有错。有人认为，如果不进行堕胎，女性的身心健康可能会受到负面或有害影响。女性可能会感到精神不稳定，甚至有女性自杀的可能性。除此之外，医疗保健专业人员分享和提出的堕胎观点仍然没有被吓倒，主要例子是“堕胎创伤性压力综合症”。
研究人员发现，焦虑和其他精神障碍对女性来说是最常见的不良反应。进行的研究为建立堕胎与创伤之间的联系提供了一种观点。了解人类的基础很重要，因此必须允许堕胎合法化。人们应该考虑这样一个事实，即堕胎的做法可以显着影响女性的幸福。如果流产会给母亲和婴儿造成严重的医疗并发症，则应允许妇女继续进行流产。每个人都有权做出自己的决定。强迫妇女不要继续堕胎在道德上是错误的。
Objections
The debate on the issue of abortion can never consider complete without the inclusion of another side of the argument. It is vital to identify and analyze particular arguments that are presented against the approach of abortion under the scenario of basic human rights. It is argued that abortion is a violation of the basic right of life as it is killing a human being (Huq et al.). It is morally incorrect to disrupt the process of birth as it is a fundamental functioning of nature.道德与法律论文代写
Human beings do not have any right to intervene in the procedure of nature by adopting the option of abortion. It is observed that the process of abortion is one of the major causes of death of many babies every year that is the ultimate loss of the human workforce. Another major argument against abortion is presented as the moral obligation of women towards the birth of children (Huq et al.). The supporters of the pro-life movement also argue that terminating the pregnancy is not a choice of basic human rights for the women. It is not a scenario of any usual body part rather it is the phenomenon of birth of human beings.
译文：
异议 道德与法律论文代写
如果不包括争论的另一方，关于堕胎问题的辩论永远不会被认为是完整的。在基本人权的情况下，识别和分析反对堕胎方法的特定论点至关重要。有人认为，堕胎是对基本生命权的侵犯，因为它正在杀死一个人（Huq 等人）。破坏出生过程在道德上是不正确的，因为它是自然的基本功能。
人类没有任何权利通过选择堕胎来干预自然过程。据观察，堕胎过程是每年许多婴儿死亡的主要原因之一，也是人类劳动力的最终损失。另一个反对堕胎的主要论点被认为是妇女对生育孩子的道德义务（Huq 等人）。反堕胎运动的支持者还争辩说，终止妊娠并不是女性基本人权的选择。它不是任何通常的身体部位的场景，而是人类诞生的现象。
The fetus is the scenario of a separate person that should not be violated with the practice of abortion.
There are situations where the circumstances behind a pregnancy are tragic including rape, a defect identified in the baby during pregnancy, prolonging the pregnancy can have a negative impact or might cause the mother at risk (Huq et al.). In circumstances, the women are raped and it resulted in the child/ pregnancy there is a need to effectively take care of the person rapped or else abortions would be the best way to heal the person.道德与法律论文代写
Also, when a person’s life is at risk or even when the child is diagnosed with some issues then the need to abort is considered the best possible way (Huq et al.). The circumstances are also opposed by antiabortion activists but there can be exceptions to deal with such situations in the short as well as long run (Huq et al.). Antiabortion activists believe that there is no way abortion to be considered as the way out rather there must be a focus on doing the efforts to avoid abortion.
The practice of abortion is characterized as morally wrong as it allows humans to kill another human. It is highly unethical to make a life choice for our own benefits. Religious factors proposed the concepts of spirituality stating that secular views are connected with the decisions regarding people die of life is their quality of life. This perspective highlights that it is only a materialistic or physical life whereas the spiritual concept is denied or ignored.
译文：
胎儿是一个单独的人的情景，不应因堕胎行为而受到侵犯。
在某些情况下，怀孕背后的情况是悲惨的，包括强奸、怀孕期间发现婴儿的缺陷、延长怀孕时间可能会产生负面影响或可能使母亲处于危险之中（Huq 等人）。在某些情况下，妇女被强奸并导致孩子/怀孕，需要有效地照顾被强奸的人，否则堕胎将是治愈该人的最佳方式。
此外，当一个人的生命处于危险之中，甚至当孩子被诊断出有一些问题时，流产被认为是最好的方法（Huq 等人）。这种情况也遭到反堕胎活动家的反对，但无论从短期还是长期来看，处理这种情况都可能有例外（Huq 等人）。反堕胎活动家认为，没有办法将堕胎视为出路，而必须专注于努力避免堕胎。
堕胎的做法在道德上是错误的，因为它允许人类杀死另一个人。为自己的利益做出人生选择是非常不道德的。宗教因素提出了灵性的概念，指出世俗的观点与关于人们死于生命的决定是他们的生活质量有关。这种观点强调它只是物质生活或物质生活，而精神概念被否认或忽视。
According to the concepts of spirituality, we are not born to fulfil our desires and to make decisions that only suits us.
However, human beings are created to honor and regard their life for the sake of Almighty (Huq et al.). It is true that every person has the right and freedom to choose and to live. But it is significant that humans should devote their lives to obey the guidelines Almighty has provided them.道德与法律论文代写
Also, sexual freedom should obey the obligations given by the Almighty. Human beings should not only pursue their selfish desires and needs. The declaration from the Bible refers to the concepts that everyone has the right to liberty, life, and happiness. Everyone has the right to live and pursue what is best for them. Therefore, human rights are a part of concepts from the Bible. The rights of same sex marriages and abortion are also similar to the declaration that everyone is free to live the way he wants to (Huq et al.).
译文：
根据灵性的概念，我们不是为了满足我们的愿望而生来做出只适合我们的决定。
然而，人类被创造出来是为了全能者来尊重和尊重他们的生命（Huq 等人）。 诚然，每个人都有选择和生活的权利和自由。 但重要的是，人类应该献身于全能者为他们提供的指导方针。
此外，性自由应该遵守全能者赋予的义务。 人类不应只追求自私的欲望和需要。 圣经中的宣言所指的概念是每个人都有自由、生命和幸福的权利。 每个人都有权生活和追求对他们最好的东西。 因此，人权是圣经概念的一部分。 同性婚姻和堕胎的权利也类似于每个人都可以按照自己想要的方式自由生活的宣言（Huq et al.）。
Plato and Socrates believed that the state and the country are a source of rights being implemented on the societies.
If a state removes God from the source of law, then it is automatically removing the characteristic laws from the societies. Therefore, concepts and beliefs designated to the religion should be a part of law making resources. Another controversial factor is the arguments among social scientists, physicians, and religious leaders are that human embryo develops after 8 weeks of conception.
According to the concepts of physicians, the human embryo starts its development soon after it is conceived. Therefore, it is not a subject that can be discarded or use for research purposes. It is proved that the ultimate source of law and rights is of Almighty, not the administrations or governments (Huq et al.). Following the laws from scientific as well as religious researches would establish certain points upon which a country can establish its laws of human rights.
译文：
柏拉图和苏格拉底认为，国家和国家是在社会上实施的权利的来源。
如果一个国家将上帝从法律的源泉中剔除，那么它就自动地从社会中剔除了特征法律。 因此，指定给宗教的概念和信仰应该是立法资源的一部分。 另一个有争议的因素是社会科学家、医生和宗教领袖之间的争论，即人类胚胎在受孕 8 周后发育。
按照医生的观念，人类胚胎在受孕后不久就开始发育。 因此，它不是一个可以丢弃或用于研究目的的主题。 事实证明，法律和权利的最终来源是全能者，而不是行政部门或政府（Huq 等）。 遵循科学和宗教研究的法律将确定某些点，一国可以据此建立其人权法。
Replies
All these uprising arguments against the practice of abortion requires consideration of strong claims in favor of abortion. Survival of life is the basic human right that is applicable to every human. The spectrum of equal gender rights demands this approach to consider the right to life for the woman also when it comes to making a choice regarding pregnancy and giving birth to a child. If the overall process of pregnancy risks the health and life of a woman than it should be prohibited and move towards the option of abortion (Weitz).
It is witnessed in the case of many underdeveloped and even developed societies that women are pressurized towards forced pregnancies that eventually caused great harm to women’s health. The overall healthcare and well-being of women should never neglect when it comes to making a choice between pregnancy and abortion. Moreover, women should have a basic human right to protect their bodies if pregnancy could risk their life. Childbearing is argued as a matter of basic freedom and equality for the women under the broad spectrum of the liberation movement. It is one of the central claims in support of abortion is that the target of gender equality can never achieve without giving proper choice to women about their decisions.
译文：
回复 道德与法律论文代写
所有这些反对堕胎做法的起义论点都需要考虑支持堕胎的强烈主张。生命的生存是适用于每个人的基本人权。平等性别权利的范围要求这种方法在做出有关怀孕和生育孩子的选择时也要考虑妇女的生命权。如果怀孕的整个过程危及女性的健康和生命，那么应该禁止并转向堕胎的选择（Weitz）。
许多不发达甚至发达的社会都见证了妇女被迫被迫怀孕的压力，最终对妇女的健康造成了极大的危害。在怀孕和堕胎之间做出选择时，女性的整体医疗保健和福祉绝不应忽视。此外，如果怀孕可能危及生命，妇女应享有保护自己身体的基本人权。在解放运动的广泛范围内，生育被认为是妇女的基本自由和平等问题。支持堕胎的核心主张之一是，如果不让女性做出适当的决定，就永远无法实现性别平等的目标。
The scenario of life choices is greatly applicable in case of the decision of women about the practice of abortion.
It can refer to the forced approach for women to continue with pregnancy due to social norms and standards regardless of the idea that if not harmful for their health. It is argued that controlling one’s own body is the basic human right that is immensely violated when any woman is forced to keep a fetus and deliver the child. The specific scenario of equal human rights claims that the objectives of equal social, economic, political equality in society can never achieve unless women have the freedom to adopt the option of abortion (Weitz).道德与法律论文代写
Moreover, the status of equal freedom for both men and women is not possible if women are derived to bear unwanted children due to family, social, or any other kind of pressure. The spectrum of human rights also covers this argument that women have right just like men and if pregnancy can harmful for their health than they should have the choice of abortion. It should be completely a woman’s decision whether or not to carry a fetus to birth as the entire procedure of pregnancy is a complex scenario for their overall health and well-being.
译文：
生活选择情景非常适用于妇女决定堕胎的情况。
它可以指由于社会规范和标准而强迫妇女继续怀孕的方法，而不管这种想法是否对她们的健康有害。有人认为，控制自己的身体是一项基本人权，当任何妇女被迫生育和分娩时，都会严重侵犯这一权利。平等人权的具体情况声称，除非妇女有选择堕胎的自由，否则社会中平等的社会、经济、政治平等的目标永远无法实现（Weitz）。
此外，如果女性因家庭、社会或任何其他类型的压力而被迫生育不想要的孩子，则男女平等自由的地位是不可能的。人权的范围也涵盖了这一论点，即女性和男性一样有权利，如果怀孕对她们的健康有害，那么她们应该选择堕胎。是否生孩子应该完全由女性决定，因为整个怀孕过程对她们的整体健康和福祉来说是一个复杂的场景。
The application of bodily rights is another moral perspective that favors the practice of abortion.
This concern is directly linked with the scenario of healthcare for women. It is characterized as the basic right of every individual to make inferences concerning their health conditions. Controlling one’s own body as a basic human right is also applicable in the case of women and their decision regarding abortion (Weitz). The absence of this right in the form of unwanted pregnancy is a clear violation of basic human rights in the case of women.道德与法律论文代写
It is ranked as a fundamental right of every human being to protect their bodies and overall well-being. If the process of pregnancy eventually stakes the health and life of the woman than abortion should remain a legal and moral option for her. The fetus exists inside a woman’s body and if it risks her life than safe abortion should consider as an option (Weitz). Freedom of personal choice is a basic standard of human rights that also present in case of a decision between abortion and pregnancy. The supporters of the choice of abortion claim that it is greatly unethical to sanction this practice because it ultimately denies the notion of freedom of selection.
译文：
身体权利的应用是另一个有利于堕胎实践的道德观点。
这种担忧与女性的医疗保健方案直接相关。它的特点是每个人都有对其健康状况进行推断的基本权利。控制自己的身体作为一项基本人权也适用于妇女及其关于堕胎的决定（Weitz）。对妇女而言，以意外怀孕的形式缺乏这项权利显然是对基本人权的侵犯。
保护自己的身体和整体福祉被列为每个人的基本权利。如果怀孕的过程最终关系到女性的健康和生命，那么堕胎对她来说应该仍然是一种合法和道德的选择。胎儿存在于女性体内，如果它冒着生命危险，则应考虑选择安全堕胎（Weitz）。个人选择自由是一项基本人权标准，也适用于在堕胎和怀孕之间做出决定的情况。堕胎选择的支持者声称，批准这种做法是非常不道德的，因为它最终否定了选择自由的概念。
Conclusion
To conclude the discussion on the debate of abortion as the facet of human rights, it is crucial to indicate that the practice of abortion should permissible considering the specific circumstances of women. Sometimes, women are not in a good position to give birth to a child and fulfill the basic necessities of life. The appearance of this sort of situation requires to provide necessary protection to women by giving them choice in the form of abortion. The analysis of the subject topic is carried out to determine the ethical issues linked to abortions and the major concerns of the discussion included the harm of abortion to women; the process punishes innocent lives, and finally, the impact of abortion on relationships and families.
The outcomes help to develop a positive viewpoint that abortions can have negative implications and side effects for women’s mental and physical health, the violation of the right to live for a child, and finally, a negative impact on family relationships. Having an abortion takes away innocent lives. However, forcing a decision on woman, rather than examining her current physical and psychological condition is inhuman practice. People should need to understand the autonomy of an individual to make the decision of his/her own. There is no need to compel someone to bear physical and mental pain if they are not willing to tolerate it. A critical analysis of abortion indicates that it’s a basic human right and women have evidently a moral and legal right to abortion.
译文：
结论 道德与法律论文代写
在结束关于堕胎作为人权方面的辩论的讨论时，必须指出，考虑到妇女的具体情况，堕胎的做法应该是允许的。有时，妇女无法生育孩子和满足基本生活必需品。这种情况的出现，需要通过堕胎的形式给予她们选择，为女性提供必要的保护。对该专题进行了分析，以确定与堕胎有关的道德问题，讨论的主要关切包括堕胎对妇女的危害；这个过程惩罚无辜的生命，最后惩罚堕胎对人际关系和家庭的影响。
结果有助于形成一种积极的观点，即堕胎会对妇女的身心健康产生负面影响和副作用，侵犯儿童的生存权，最后，对家庭关系产生负面影响。堕胎会带走无辜的生命。但是，强迫妇女做决定而不是检查妇女当前的身心状况是不人道的做法。人们应该了解个人的自主权，以做出他/她自己的决定。如果一个人不愿意忍受，就没有必要强迫他们承受身心的痛苦。对堕胎的批判性分析表明，这是一项基本人权，妇女显然拥有堕胎的道德和法律权利。
It is essential to mention that restricting women from access to abortion rights will not erode the actions for all women.
It is a matter of financial resources in which women who can afford high quality care of reproductive health can avail the chance to sustain the pregnancy, however, those unable to acquire quality care, have fewer facilities due to rural areas or restrictions from homes due to lack of financial resources would prefer to use the right to an abortion. Similarly, backgrounds from poorer communities are more likely to pursue abortions. It is argued that it is the fundamental right of the woman to provide a necessary life-support system to fetuses to ensure the protection of children’s life.
The identification of philosophical grounds against abortion is also a necessary condition to recognize the ethical spectrum of this issue.道德与法律论文代写
It is argued that there is a need to draw a line when it comes to differentiating the existing difference between personhood from humanity. This form of difference is a feasible condition to evaluate the position of the child during the process of pregnancy.
However, it is not morally wrong to practice abortion in order to save the life of a mother. It is morally wrong to force a woman regarding her decision to abort. If she is unwilling to give birth to a child, due to medical complications or other reasons, then she should be allowed to practice abortion. A critical examination of the entire scenario indicates that abortion is the right of a woman and no one should need to take that away from her. It is unethical to force a woman to give birth to a baby if she is not interested.
译文：
必须指出的是，限制妇女获得堕胎权不会削弱所有妇女的行动。
这是财政资源的问题，可以负担得起高质量保健服务的妇女可以利用机会维持怀孕，但是，由于农村地区或家庭的限制，得不到优质服务的妇女设施较少，缺乏财政资源宁愿使用堕胎权。同样，来自较贫穷社区的背景更有可能追求堕胎。据认为，为胎儿提供必要的生命支持系统以确保保护儿童生命是妇女的基本权利。
确定反对堕胎的哲学依据也是认识这个问题的伦理范围的必要条件。
有人认为，在区分人格与人性之间的现有差异时，需要划清界限。这种形式的差异是评估孩子在怀孕过程中的位置的可行条件。
然而，为了挽救母亲的生命而进行堕胎在道德上并没有错。强迫妇女做出堕胎决定在道德上是错误的。如果她由于医疗并发症或其他原因不愿生育孩子，则应允许她进行堕胎。对整个场景的批判性检查表明，堕胎是女性的权利，没有人需要剥夺她的权利。如果女人不感兴趣，强迫她生孩子是不道德的。
Works Cited: 道德与法律论文代写
Bodenner, Chris. “The Drive to Abort a Down Syndrome Baby.” The Atlantic. N. p., 2016. Web.
Huq, M. E., et al. “Why Abortion is Illegal? Comparison of Legal and Illegal Abortion: A Critical Review.” Mymensingh medical journal: MMJ 26.4 (2017): 944-952.道德与法律论文代写
Norris, Alison, et al. “Abortion stigma: a reconceptualization of constituents, causes, and consequences.” Women’s health issues 21.3 (2011): S49-S54.
Weitz, Tracy A. “Rethinking the mantra that abortion should be “safe, legal, and rare”.” Reproduction and Society: Interdisciplinary Readings. Routledge, 2014. 87-94.
其他代写：web代写 program代写 cs作业代写 app代写 Programming代写 homework代写 source code代写 考试助攻 finance代写 代写CS C++代写 finance代写 java代写 analysis代写
