Week 1 Discussion Responses: Price Gouging
讨论回应价格欺诈essay代写 I can relate what you are trying to say. From what you have written, it is evident you support price gouging.
Response Rosanna Torres 讨论回应价格欺诈essay代写
I can relate what you are trying to say. From what you have written, it is evident you support price gouging. However, it might be misleading to talk about increasing the price of essential items and services. The phrasing renders the whole argument about price gouging morally wrong and ill-motivated. Nonetheless, price increase should be based on forces of demand and supply. It is correct that at the time of disaster, the need for essential commodities and services like foods, water, gasoline, and power increase. In a natural market, when the demand is high, suppliers increase prices. High demand also causes shortage and hence prices have to increase to attract more suppliers in the market.讨论回应价格欺诈essay代写
Therefore, price gouging is an interference with the normal functioning of the market. According to Munger, though the people in South Carolina felt exploited by young sellers and applauded their arrest, they were buying the ice because it was a necessity to some and there was none in the market. The sellers charged four-times the price considering the risk and logistical costs in delivering the product to them.
Word count: 178
译文：
回应 罗莎娜·托雷斯 讨论回应价格欺诈essay代写
我可以把你想说的话联系起来。从你所写的，很明显你支持价格欺诈。然而，谈论提高基本物品和服务的价格可能会产生误导。这种措辞使关于价格欺诈的整个论点在道德上是错误的和缺乏动机的。尽管如此，价格上涨应该基于需求和供应的力量。在灾难发生时，对食物、水、汽油和电力等基本商品和服务的需求增加是正确的。在自然市场中，当需求很高时，供应商会提高价格。高需求也导致短缺，因此必须提高价格以吸引更多供应商进入市场。
因此，哄抬物价是对市场正常运作的干扰。根据芒格的说法，尽管南卡罗来纳州的人们感到被年轻卖家剥削并为他们的被捕鼓掌，但他们购买冰块是因为它对某些人来说是必需品，而市场上没有。考虑到向卖家交付产品的风险和物流成本，卖家收取了四倍的价格。
字数：178
Work Cited 讨论回应价格欺诈essay代写
Munger, Michael. “They Clapped: Can Price-Gouging Laws Prohibit Scarcity?” January 8, 2007. Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved July 28, 2016, from https://www.econlib.org/library/Columns/y2007/Mungergouging.html
Response to Natalia Escobar Sotomonte
I agree with you that price gouging is not as evil as most consumer advocates and politicians seem to put forth. Anti-price gouging campaigners are only sympathetic to the victims of disaster, and hence their argument is mostly based on emotions rather than economic rationality. Consumers should be protected regardless of whether there is disaster or not. In any case the approach adopted should not harm them.讨论回应价格欺诈essay代写
The application of ethics in economics will make the law of market operations harmful (Carney p. 84). It is acceptable to use price gouging if there is a shortage of goods in demand. In such situation, any supplier will be exploiting consumers. But if it is abundant in areas surrounding the disaster, normal market processes should prevail. Shortage attracts suppliers and high demand increase prices. Therefore, price gouging is an isolated market natural response.
Word count: 142
译文：
对 Natalia Escobar Sotomonte 的回应 讨论回应价格欺诈essay代写
我同意你的观点，哄抬物价并不像大多数消费者权益倡导者和政客们所说的那样邪恶。 反价格欺诈者只同情灾难的受害者，因此他们的论点主要基于情感而非经济理性。 无论是否发生灾难，消费者都应该受到保护。 在任何情况下，所采用的方法都不应该伤害他们。
伦理学在经济学中的应用将使市场运作的规律变得有害（Carney p. 84）。 如果需求商品短缺，使用哄抬价格是可以接受的。 在这种情况下，任何供应商都会剥削消费者。 但如果灾区周边地区资源丰富，则应遵循正常的市场流程。 短缺吸引了供应商，而高需求则提高了价格。 因此，哄抬物价是一种孤立的市场自然反应。
字数：142
Work Cited 讨论回应价格欺诈essay代写
Carney, John. “In the News: Price Increase after Disasters.” Principles of Economics, Cengage Learning, 2015, pp. 84-85.
其他代写：代写CS C++代写 java代写 algorithm代写 r代写 金融经济统计代写 matlab代写 web代写 app代写 作业代写 数学代写 考试助攻
