ethical dilemma代写 The ethical dilemma John faces is whether reports to the Chinese government that the company has not dealt with pollution from production
The ethical dilemma John faces is whether reports to the Chinese government that the company has not dealt with pollution from production as required for the past production. If he reports on the problem, the company may face huge fines and pollution treatment costs; if he does not report the problem, the company’s pollution may endanger the health of residents who use the river as a source of water. ethical dilemma代写
(b)The reasons why Jonathan did not report pollution are as follows:
in China, pollution is not as valued as in their country. This is the denial of receptibility, and he is trying to make Chinese government and the society responsible for the pollution instead of the company. ethical dilemma代写
there are a large number of other companies that have similar pollution problems, and if they report pollution, they may have to deal with pollution for these companies. This is the emphasis of the social weighting by selective social comparison.ethical dilemma代写
the people have to take much the pollution before the sickness. This is the denial of injury. He is trying to convince no one is affected by the pollution done by their company.ethical dilemma代写
for local residents, their use of the polluted river as water sources can endanger their health.
for the fishermen, they are affected by the decrease on the creatures in the river.
for employee of Larwin’s Chinese subsidiary, if the pollution is discovered and reported, their job may be affected.ethical dilemma代写
for the Larwin Chemical Company, its global reputation may be affected by the illegal pollution.
for the manager of the Chinese factory, they may face the accusation of illegal pollution.
for the government, when the government finds that the river is seriously polluted in the future, the government needs to spend a lot of government money to deal with the pollution problem.ethical dilemma代写
First of all,
from the perspective of utilitarianism, solving the problem of environmental pollution can better protect the health of local residents. This is good for the overall benefit.ethical dilemma代写
from the perspective of feminist ethics, protecting the environment can better maintain social relations and promote people to care more about each other. And this ethical action can make him happy and away from sense of guilty.ethical dilemma代写
from the perspective of ethics of duties, it is the responsibility of every company to protect the environment. If all companies pollute the environment, then our living environment cannot be guaranteed. The company has the duty to clean up the pollution. And this obeys the Kant’s 3 Maxims.ethical dilemma代写
from the perspective of ethics of rights, local residents have the right to live in a good, pollution-free environment.
form the theory of justice, the fair procedure and fair outcome should be obeyed.
form the egoism, the hiding and not reporting of the pollution may caused sever consequences, which may cause John be accused.ethical dilemma代写
If George is an ethical consumer, he should not continue to use Amazon to buy goods, because Amazon’s neglect of the interests of employees is not in line with ethical principles.ethical dilemma代写
The credibility of this article needs to be confirmed by other materials. George cannot just rely on this article to make educated decision, and he needs to search for more relevant materials.
It is not ethical to see employees as robots.
First of all, from the perspective of ethics of rights, employees have the right to work in a good environment and obtain the necessary respect, but Amazon’s supervision of employee behavior causes employees to work at a great pressure, and employees with three errors will be fired, all of which are the neglect of employee rights.ethical dilemma代写
Second, from the perspective of feminist ethics, people should care more about each other., and the company and the management should be more concerned with the situation of employees, but Amazon just sees employees as robots and does not give them the care and help they deserved.ethical dilemma代写
First, George can collect more material to verify that Amazon sees employees as robots. Second, if Amazon does see employees as robots, George can stop using Amazon to buy goods. Third, George can publicize the problem to his relatives and friends and ask them stop using Amazon to buy goods. Fourth, George can expose the problem to the media or through online social platforms by legitimate channels, calling on more ethical consumers to stop using Amazon to buy goods.ethical dilemma代写
Different stakeholders can take different measures to improve the work environment of Amazon employees.ethical dilemma代写
First, the government can step in to investigate and punish Amazon’s behavior; secondly, the media can increase exposure to Amazon’s non-ethical behavior, make consumers aware of Amazon’s behavior, and refuse to use Amazon to shop;
third, social groups can organize a variety of activities to apply pressure to Amazon to improve the work environment of employees; and fourthly, trade union organizations can negotiate with Amazon and contribute to the improvement of the work environment of employees through collective bargaining.ethical dilemma代写
The main ethical issue involved in the case is the use of child workers on tobacco farms in dangerous condition. These children work dangerously on tobacco farms, and it is of great risk to their health, but their wages are very low. This is of economic interest to tobacco farms.ethical dilemma代写
some of these children are working for their own family’s farm. The regulation may do harm to the tobacco industrial and the children’s family.
the market of the tobacco is large the high-cost product may do harm to the customers.ethical dilemma代写
First of all,
from the perspective of utilitarianism, in the case scenario, child workers work on tobacco farms. For many child workers, there is a phenomenon of nicotine poisoning, and they feel nausea, dizziness, which causes great harm to their bodies. In such hazardous work, they earn only from $0.73 to $1.10 a day. Even if the tobacco product is cheaper, the loss of the total society is much larger than the benefit earned by the children.ethical dilemma代写
the use of child workers on tobacco farms harms the health of these children and is unethical in this sense. And the government should consider to change the situations. At least the farm owners, the children and the children’s parents should know how to protect the worker form the green tobacco sickness.
From the perspective of egoism,
the child should do for his own analysis to balance between the gain and the loss. The farm owners’ purpose is to maximize their economic interest, the use of child labor does not violate the egoism principle. And the customers are willing to choose the tobacco with the cheap price. Therefore, the use of the child labor is not unethical.ethical dilemma代写
from the perspective of feminist ethics, it is of great importance to care and protect the physical and mental health of children and to promote the harmonious development of society and the relationship among the society. The children probably are not really happy when doing the work and suffering the sickness. And the relationship in the family may also be destroyed by the sickness caused by the sickness, even if the income can be used for children’s education in the future. Therefore, the use of child labor in dangerous condition is unethical.ethical dilemma代写
From the perspective of ethic of rights,
it is basic human right to be heath and away from the sickness. The use of child labor in dangerous condition obviously violate the human right. Therefore, it is unethical.ethical dilemma代写
On the one hand,
if I were the management of tobacco companies, in the purchase of tobacco, I will pay more attention to the ethical issues of the tobacco farm, in particular the use of child workers as mentioned in the case. If I find out there are ethical problems with the tobacco farm, I will not purchase tobacco from there. At the same time, I will also continue to pay close attention to cooperative tobacco farms and monitor their operations in a variety of ways, so that they do not act as a violation of the ethical principles such as the employment of child workers.ethical dilemma代写
On the other hand,
I will promote the knowledge of the harm of “green tobacco sickness”, and try to promote the government and the consumers to pay attention to the health of the tobacco worker. With the promise on no child labor, the company’s reputation may be promoted and lead the industrial change.ethical dilemma代写