Faculty of Information Technology
Portfolio代写 The purpose of this assignment is to provide you with feedback as you study the unit throughout the semester.
FIT9130 Systems Analysis and Design
Assignment One: Portfolio
Semester 2, 2018
Assignment Overview Portfolio代写
The purpose of this assignment is to provide you with feedback as you study the unit throughout the semester. While other assignments and the exam are means by which we assess your performance, this assignment is intended to help you gauge your own progress with feedback on several small tasks throughout the semester.
This portfolio assignment consists of several activities organised into two categories: reading and reflection, and modelling exercises. For the reading exercises, you will submit two short reflective critiques and receive feedback from your tutor. For the modelling exercises, you will meet with your tutor for face-to-face feedback and discussion of your designs.Portfolio代写
Assignment Due Date
Category 1 Reading Critiques
- First critique: 4pm Friday 17th August 2018 (Week4)
- Second critique: 4pm Friday 12th October 2018 (Week11)
Category 2 Modelling Tasks
- First task submission: 11.30 pm Sunday 2nd September 2018 (Week 6), with feedback session in the following
- Second task submission: 4 pm Friday 5th October 2018 (Week 10), with feedback session in the following
Feedback sessions will be booked with your tutor in the class in the week prior to the session. Failure to attend the feedback session will result in the submission not being assessed.Portfolio代写
Each activity has equal weight and your overall result for the assignment will be the sum of your marks for each activity divided by four.
Your result for the entire assignment contributes 10% of the marks to your final FIT9130 result.
Learning Objectives Portfolio代写
Successful completion of this assignment will lead to:
- understanding of the underlying principles, theories and concepts relevant to the design of information systems; and
- skills in using various techniques, including modelling techniques, to design information
Turnitin – Category 1 Reading Critiques Only
Turnitin is an online tool to assist students and staff in understanding and supporting the ethical and appropriate use of materials. Students are required to submit an electronic version (in .doc format and WITHOUT the cover page) of Category One submissions only through the Moodle site of this unit. There is no need to submit your Category Two submissions for analysis.
Turnitin generates the initial originality report quickly. However, if you resubmit your assignment for analysis, there will be a 24-hour delay before a new report is generated.Portfolio代写
You are permitted multiple submissions to Turnitin until the due date of the relevant task. You may want to make improvements based on the report and resubmit it through the same Turnitin submission link. Each submission will overwrite the previous submission and only the last submission / originality report will be viewed.
Further details can be found at:
All students should submit their submissions via the relevant link on Moodle. Category 1 tasks will be submitted via a TurnItIn link. Category 2 will be via a standard Moodle Assignment link. Both types of submission are performed via Moodle.
Each category 2 submission must be either: Portfolio代写
- a PDF or JPEG image in the case of diagrams (if using Visio, export your diagrams to the appropriate format, do not attach Visio files directly),or
- PDF or Microsoft Word in the case of text-based
- For the modelling submissions, include a properly completedcoversheet
- Include your name and student ID in the filename
Do not submit Visio or other drawing software documents for Category 2. Export to PDF or JPEG first.
Submissions for Category 2 tasks must be submitted in the week prior to your feedback session.
In the case of written reflective pieces:
- Depthof analysis (critical thinking, richness of arguments such as application and examples supported by theories / literature reviews / industrial experiences)
- Quality of expression (academic writing with appropriate references, grammar, structure and format)
In the case of design exercises:
- Quality of the design (completeness and depth of analysis showingcognitive and logical skills)Portfolio代写
- Correctness of the use of the relevant technique (demonstrating sound knowledge and skills of the relevanttechnique)
All criteria will have equal weighting in determining your mark for the submission.Systems Analysis
Extensions/Special Consideration Portfolio代写
All applications for special consideration must be made no later than two days after the submission date and must be made using the Special Consideration Application form available via the Unit’s Moodle site. You must read the associated Special Consideration policy outlining the grounds for granting special consideration and attach the appropriate documentation to your form. Submit your form to your lecturer not your tutor.
Do not assume that submission of a Special Consideration application guarantees that it will be granted – you must receive confirmation that it has been granted from the lecturer.
Penalty for Late Submission Portfolio代写
Late submissions without an approved extension will be subject to a penalty of 10 marks per day. Weekends count as a single day. No submission will be accepted more than one week late.
Plagiarism and Collusion
Note that this is an individual assignment. While general collaboration between students in terms of understanding of modelling concepts is acceptable, the assignment and the solution contained in it must be entirely your own work.
You must not:
- Use another student’s work as the basis for your
- Use another student’s work to help ‘give youideas’
- Steal,appropriate or make use of the work of another student without their knowledge.
- Lend your work to another student for anyreason
- Borrow work from another student for anyreason
- Use the ideas, words or other intellectual property of anyone without proper
- Leave your work unattended on the student laboratory computers or give your authcate details to anyone.Portfolio代写
Reference to students above includes both former and current students, as well as students in other units.
Penalties for plagiarism and/or collusion can include formal reprimands, notes being attached to your student file, failure in the assignment, failure in the unit or even suspension or exclusion from the university.
See the Unit Guide for more information on plagiarism and cheating, and for links to Faculty and University policies on this topic.
Portfolio Activities Portfolio代写
Category One – Reading and Critique
There are five readings given in the list. You can select any two papers out of these five papers. Submit two reflective pieces of approximately 500 words each. The first critique is due in Week 4 and the second critique is due in Week 11.
Submissions should be well structured (introduction, body and conclusion, with a coherent argument throughout) and properly referenced using APA style, and clearly identify the reading being critiqued. The references are excluded for the word count.
All readings can be found online by searching the Library’s website.Portfolio代写
Your critique should not just be a summary of the reading. See the attached guide for writing a critique from the Queensland University of Technology. We will be looking to see how you integrate what you learn from the reading with what you’ve learnt elsewhere in the unit, such as from the lectures or the other readings assigned each week.
Readings to select from:
- Borkowski, S., Sandrick, C., Wagila, K., Goller, C., Ye, C., & Zhao, L. (2016). Magicbands in the Magic Kingdom: Customer-CentricInformation Technology Implementation at Disney. Journal of the International Academy for Case Studies, 22(3), 143-151.
- Davenport, T. H., & Kudyba, S. (2016). Designing and developing analytics-based data products. MIT Sloan Management Review, 58(1), 83- 89.
- Eden, R., & Sedera, D. (2014). The largest admitted IT project failure in the Southern Hemisphere: A teaching case. Paper presented at the 35th International Conference on Information Systems: Building a Better World Through Information Systems,
- Lech, P. (2016). Causes and remedies for the dominant risk factorsin
Enterprise System implementation projects: the consultants’ perspective. SpringerPlus, 5(1), 238. doi:10.1186/s40064-016-1862-9
- Mitra, A., & Neale, P. (2014). Visions of a pole position: Developing inimitable resource capacity through enterprise systems implementation in Nestlé. Strategic Change, 23(3-4),225-235.
Tips on writing a critique Portfolio代写
Writing a critique involves evaluating a piece of work.
In this case you are writing short critiques of journal articles. Although the term sounds like you need to be critical of the work, it doesn’t mean that your evaluation must be negative. The idea is to highlight strengths and weaknesses in the argument being put forward, and to evaluate it in the context of your knowledge of the area. Your critique should not be a summary of the article (although you do need to quickly summarise the main ideas), but rather a discussion of the ideas. In short, you’re putting forward your opinion of the piece and possibly putting it into a broader context based on your other readings or in applying it to the field of information systems.
Attached is a guide to writing critiques from the Queensland University of Technology that includes a checklist of things to make sure you do.
Keep in mind that these are meant to be short reflective pieces, not extended essays. Your work should highlight one or two key ideas that you think are important and describe how they relate to your learning in the unit.Portfolio代写
Category Two – Design Exercises
Complete the following modelling tasks and submit one of your task 1 in Week 6, and task 2 in Week 10. For these category two exercises, you will be required to attend a feedback session with your tutor (off-campus students will use telephone or Skype as agreed with your tutor). The session will be a one-on-one session where you will explain your design to your tutor and answer questions about your design. Your tutor will also ask you to change your design by suggesting alternative design requirements. Feedback sessions will be held in Weeks 7 and 11 – the week following submission on Moodle.
It is compulsory to attend your feedback session. Portfolio代写
Your tutor will schedule your session in the week prior to the session. If you are unable to attend your feedback session, you must apply for special consideration. Submissions will receive 0 marks if the session is missed without special consideration approval.The Walt Disney Company, also known as Walt Disney or Disney, is an American diversified multinational mass media and entertainment conglomerate, headquartered at the Walt Disney Studios in Burbank, California.
Their mission is to be one of the world’s leading producers and providers of entertainment and information. Disney seek to develop the most creative, innovative and profitable entertainment experiences and related products in the world. Disney’s theme parks are one of the most profitable and famous product. Because of their desire to be the best in the world, their theme parks came up with the idea to develop a Magic band that connects with all facilities available in the park.Portfolio代写
It is a wrist band that you buy from the Disney theme park, and if you’re wearing your Disney MagicBand and you’ve made a reservation, a host will greet you at the drawbridge and already knowyour name. The MagicBand is expected to provide all information, recognition of the customer, customization and personalization. The MagicBand will enable room entry, park entry, payments, fastpass+ and many other Disney offerings. This also connects with the mobile app and will share all photographs to the customer’s Disney account.You are hired as a business analyst to design this solution and add a new feature to the existing design.
You are required to do some reading about Disney MagicBand
and introduce an additional feature. Apart from the basic features of the MagicBand such as customer registration, payments, room and park entry, you are required to introduce an additional feature. Please note the additional feature can be an existing feature of the MagicBand, however it should not be a basic feature (e.g., customer registration, payments, room and park entry). As the business analyst, you are required to draw and extend your basic ER diagram and Use case diagram to reflect the basic features and the additional feature.
For the following scenario:
Task 1 (Week 6): Draw a logical entity relationship diagram. Indicate primary and foreign keys appropriately.
Task 2 (Week 10): Draw a use case diagram (which include all actors and use cases) and a system sequence diagram for a selected use case.
QUT c ite|w ri te – Writing a c ritiq ue 6/ 03/ 2015 4: 44 pm
Writing a critique Portfolio代写
What is a critique?
A critique is a genre of academic writing that briefly summarises and critically evaluates a work or concept. Critiques can be used to carefully analyse a variety of works such as:
Creative works – novels, exhibits, film, images, poetry
Research – monographs, journal articles, systematic reviews, theories Media – news reports, feature articles
Like an essay, a critique uses a formal, academic writing style and has a clear structure, that is, an introduction, body and conclusion. However, the body of a critique includes a summary of the work and a detailed evaluation. The purpose of an evaluation is to gauge the usefulness or impact of a work in a particular field.
Why do we write critiques?
Writing a critique on a work helps us to develop:
A knowledge of the work’s subject area or related works.
An understanding of the work’s purpose, intended audience, development of argument, structure of evidence or creative style.
A recognition of the strengths and weaknesses of the work.
How to write a critique？ Portfolio代写
Before you start writing, it is important to have a thorough understanding of the work that will be critiqued.
Study the work under discussion. Make notes on key parts of the work.
Develop an understanding of the main argument or purpose being expressed in the work. Consider how the work relates to a broader issue or context.
There are a variety of ways to structure a critique. You should always check your unit materials or blackboard site for guidance from your lecturer. The following template, which showcases the main features of a critique, is provided as one example.
Typically, the introduction is short (less than 10% of the word length) and you should:
Name the work being reviewed as well as the date it was created and the name of the author/creator. Describe the main argument or purpose of the work.
Explain the context in which the work was created. This could include the social or political context, the place of the work in a creative or academic tradition, or the relationship between the work and the creator’s life experience.
Have a concluding sentence that signposts what your evaluation of the work will be. For instance, it may indicate
ht t p : / / w w w.c it ew rit e. q ut . ed u. au/ w rit e/ c rit iq ue. jsp Pag e 1 o f 3
QUT c ite|w ri te – Writing a c ritiq ue 6/ 03/ 2015 4: 44 pm
whether it is a positive, negative, or mixed evaluation.
Briefly summarise the main points and objectively describe how the creator portrays these by using techniques, styles, media, characters or symbols. This summary should not be the focus of the critique and is usually shorter than the critical evaluation.Portfolio代写
This section should give a systematic and detailed assessment of the different elements of the work, evaluating how well the creator was able to achieve the purpose through these. For example: you would assess the plot structure, characterisation and setting of a novel; an assessment of a painting would look at composition, brush strokes, colour and light; a critique of a research project would look at subject selection, design of the experiment, analysis of data and conclusions.
A critical evaluation does not simply highlight negative impressions. It should deconstruct the work and identify both strengths and weaknesses. It should examine the work and evaluate its success, in light of its purpose.Portfolio代写
Examples of key critical questions that could help your assessment include:
Who is the creator? Is the work presented objectively or subjectively? What are the aims of the work? Were the aims achieved?
What techniques, styles, media were used in the work? Are they effective in portraying the purpose? What assumptions underlie the work? Do they affect its validity?
What types of evidence or persuasion are used? Has evidence been interpreted fairly?
How is the work structured? Does it favour a particular interpretation or point of view? Is it effective?Portfolio代写
Does the work enhance understanding of key ideas or theories? Does the work engage (or fail to engage) with key concepts or other works in its discipline?
This evaluation is written in formal academic style and logically presented. Group and order your ideas into paragraphs. Start with the broad impressions first and then move into the details of the technical elements. For shorter critiques, you may discuss the strengths of the works, and then the weaknesses. In longer critiques, you may wish to discuss the positive and negative of each key critical question in individual paragraphs.
To support the evaluation, provide evidence from the work itself, such as a quote or example, and you should also cite evidence from related sources. Explain how this evidence supports your evaluation of the work.
This is usually a very brief paragraph, which includes:
A statement indicating the overall evaluation of the work
A summary of the key reasons, identified during the critical evaluation, why this evaluation was formed. Portfolio代 In some circumstances, recommendations for improvement on the work may be appropriate.Portfolio代写
Include all resources cited in your critique. Check with your lecturer/tutor for which referencing style to use.
Checklist for a critique
ht t p : / / w w w.c it ew rit e. q ut . ed u. au/ w rit e/ c rit iq ue. jsp Pag e 2 o f 3
QUT c ite|w ri te – Writing a c ritiq ue 6/ 03/ 2015 4: 44 pm
Mentioned the name of the work, the date of its creation and the name of the creator? Accurately summarised the work being critiqued?
Mainly focused on the critical evaluation of the work?
Systematically outlined an evaluation of each element of the work to achieve the overall purpose?Portfolio代写
used evidence, from the work itself as well as other sources, to back and illustrate my assessment of elements of of the work?
formed an overall evaluation of the work, based on critical reading? used a well structured introduction, body and conclusion?
used correct grammar, spelling and punctuation; clear presentation; and appropriate referencing style?
University of New South Wales – some general criteria for evaluating works University of Toronto – The book review or article critique
CRICOS No. 00213J
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Australia
Last modified 07-Oct-2014
ht t p : / / w w w.c it ew rit e. q ut . ed u. au/ w rit e/ c rit iq ue. jsp Pag e 3 o f 3